Strong Rebuttal from India on USCIRF’s Claims
India has strongly condemned the US Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) for its latest report, calling it biased, politically motivated, and a deliberate attempt to misrepresent the reality of India’s religious diversity. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) responded with a sharp rebuttal, stating that it is the USCIRF, not India, that should be labeled as an “entity of concern.”
The report, released as part of the USCIRF’s annual review of religious freedom worldwide, alleges that religious minorities in India continue to face discrimination and persecution. However, India firmly rejected these claims, arguing that they lack credibility and do not reflect the ground reality.
India’s Response: Setting the Record Straight
The MEA issued a firm statement rejecting the USCIRF’s findings, which claimed that religious minorities in India face deteriorating treatment. India pointed out that:
- The USCIRF has a history of making politically motivated assessments against India, often based on selective and misleading data.
- The report selectively highlights isolated incidents while ignoring India’s multicultural fabric and legal protections for religious minorities.
- The commission has consistently failed to acknowledge India’s constitutional commitment to religious freedom and peaceful coexistence.
- Religious diversity is deeply embedded in India’s history, culture, and governance, making it one of the most pluralistic societies in the world.
India also questioned the legitimacy of the USCIRF’s work, stating that its claims appear to be driven by an agenda rather than genuine concern for religious freedom. The government emphasized that India remains a secular democracy where individuals of all faiths have equal rights and freedoms.
Allegations Against R&AW: India Dismisses Charges
The USCIRF’s report went beyond religious freedom concerns, calling for sanctions on India’s external intelligence agency, the Research & Analysis Wing (R&AW). The report alleged that R&AW was involved in “assassination plots” against Khalistani separatists overseas.
New Delhi dismissed these accusations as baseless and pointed out that:
- The USCIRF has no authority or expertise to make such claims about intelligence operations.
- The allegations lack credible evidence and appear to be part of a broader narrative to undermine India’s global standing.
- The commission’s recommendations reflect an overtly political bias rather than an objective analysis of religious freedom.
- The Indian government remains committed to upholding national security while respecting international law.
India argued that targeting R&AW without solid proof not only damages the credibility of the USCIRF but also raises concerns about the panel’s impartiality and intentions.
India’s Multicultural Reality: A Counter to USCIRF’s Report
The Indian government emphasized that the country is home to 1.4 billion people practicing various religions in harmony. The MEA highlighted that India’s Constitution guarantees freedom of religion and safeguards minority rights.
| Aspect | Reality in India |
|---|---|
| Religious Freedom | Guaranteed under the Constitution, every citizen has the right to practice, profess, and propagate their faith. |
| Multicultural Coexistence | India is home to all major world religions, including Hinduism, Islam, Christianity, Sikhism, Buddhism, and Jainism. |
| Legal Protections | Strong anti-discrimination laws exist to protect religious minorities from persecution. |
| Political Representation | Minority leaders hold key government positions, including in Parliament and state assemblies. |
| Festivals and Traditions | National holidays and cultural events celebrate religious diversity. |
India also reiterated that it does not expect the USCIRF to acknowledge these realities, given its history of biased reporting. The government asserted that the country’s commitment to pluralism and religious tolerance is deeply rooted in its governance and social structure.
US Government Unlikely to Act on USCIRF’s Recommendations
Despite the USCIRF’s recommendations, experts believe it is highly unlikely that the US government will impose sanctions on R&AW or designate India as a “country of particular concern.” This is because:
- The USCIRF’s recommendations are advisory and not legally binding on the US administration.
- The US government considers India a key strategic partner in global affairs, particularly in defense, trade, and security.
- Prior similar recommendations by the USCIRF have not been acted upon by Washington, as they do not align with broader US foreign policy objectives.
- The US State Department and White House prioritize diplomatic engagement over punitive measures, making it unlikely that they will follow the USCIRF’s suggestions.
India’s Strong Stand: “USCIRF Should Be Designated as an Entity of Concern”
New Delhi did not hold back in its criticism of the USCIRF, stating that its pattern of misrepresentation and politically motivated reports warrants its own designation as an “entity of concern.” The MEA accused the commission of deliberately undermining India’s reputation on the global stage.
The Indian government made it clear that:
- India remains a beacon of democracy, religious tolerance, and constitutional freedoms.
- The USCIRF’s efforts to malign India’s image will not succeed, as they lack credibility and a factual basis.
- The commission’s biased stance is evident from its consistent targeting of India while ignoring religious freedom issues in other parts of the world.
- The international community should question the credibility and objectivity of the USCIRF, given its history of selective criticism.
By taking a firm stand, India reaffirmed its position as a diverse and inclusive society that upholds religious freedom as a fundamental right.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)
1. What is the USCIRF, and what does it do?
The US Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) is a government advisory body that monitors religious freedom worldwide and makes policy recommendations to the US government. However, its recommendations are not legally binding, and the US government is not obligated to act upon them.
2. Why is India opposing the USCIRF report?
India has rejected the report, calling it biased and politically motivated. The government argues that the USCIRF selectively highlights incidents without acknowledging India’s constitutional protections, religious diversity, and commitment to secular governance. India believes that the commission’s assessments do not reflect the ground reality.
3. What are the allegations against R&AW in the USCIRF report?
The USCIRF claims that India’s external intelligence agency, R&AW, was involved in assassination plots against Khalistani separatists overseas. India has dismissed these allegations as baseless, arguing that they are politically motivated and lack concrete evidence. New Delhi asserts that such claims are an attempt to tarnish India’s global reputation.
4. Will the US impose sanctions on India based on the USCIRF’s recommendations?
It is highly unlikely. The USCIRF’s recommendations are purely advisory and have no legal standing. Given India’s strategic importance to the US, Washington is unlikely to impose sanctions or take punitive measures against India based on the commission’s report.
Click here to learn more
